How to Read and Write Reaction Essay
Ex.one. Report the instructions how to write a reaction essay.
one Prepare for your reaction essay past completing the reading, watching the documentary or participating in the seminar for the reaction essay topic.
2 Bring a notepad and newspaper to the presentation or while yous are reading and jot downwardly notes and thoughts that you have while participating. This makes sure that yous get a true reaction essay, using gut responses to what you are experiencing.
3 Outline your response essay past answering a few questions and writing them down earlier you organize them in essay course. How did you feel? What did you run across? What is your stance? What is a good case? What can you conclude is your reaction? Create a class where you can quickly jot downwardly your ideas and outline your essay.
iv Organize your findings and notes into an essay. Brainstorm with your theme past stating what your reaction was. Then, in the body of the essay, y'all can explicate why that was your reaction. Virtually reaction essays are set up so that you are pitting the author's findings against your own thoughts and feelings. They may be the same, but they may exist different. For case, your reaction paper could be based on the thought that while the filmmaker is in favor of universal health care, you believe that health care should remain privatized.
5 Start each paragraph by stating what the writer believes and his general thoughts on the subject. Then follow with your thoughts on the subject and your ain behavior. Remember to use supporting evidence such as quotes, events and studies that explain why y'all feel that style. For example, one of your supporting paragraphs could be the sentiment that the filmmaker believes that universal wellness care would improve the quality of care everyone receives, while your reaction is that universal wellness care would reduce competition and result in worse intendance for the general public.
vi Conclude the essay with what your reaction was and how the detail slice of media afflicted your reaction. Explain if it was inverse and why, or if it remained the same and why. Utilise footnotes to cite references used throughout.
Robinson Crusoe: what Tin He Show us Today?
"The one volume that teaches all that books can teach"
Rousseau
"I shall pass through this world but once; whatever good thing therefore I tin can do, or any kindness I can show to any human beingness let me do it now, permit me not defer it or fail it, for I shall not pass this way again."
Stephen Grellet
Robinson Crusoe is not just about shipwreck, survival and rescue, simply Defoe's novel also relates i human being's spiritual journey in search of self and his goal of setting things right and making amends. Finding the self may take a lifetime. It took 20-8 years on the island for Crusoe to discover more about himself, and, of grade, he had to look that number of years before he could brand up for past mistakes. However, we exercise not take an bounding main preventing us from making amends, and if merely readers were to open up themselves to this book, for all its clumsiness, flat style and Eurocentricity, it can, by illustrating one man's life, illuminate ours.
To begin opening ourselves nosotros must brainstorm to identify with Crusoe. This is not as easy as it might seem. For one thing, in my case, he is a man, and I am a woman. He lived two hundred years ago so had very different values. He was white. I am non. Information technology is, however, necessary to button these things aside and become to the text. Look especially at instances when Crusoe is not the most politically correct of heroes- -when he seems most at odds with our thinking. Consider Crusoe's treatment of Friday. Friday has no name of his ain, and he, the "vicious," automatically becomes a servant. Here, Crusoe is condescending and racist. Yet, when I look at my ain actions towards others, I have to admit that many times they autumn short of beingness good or just. Let us be honest, don't we all shun or dislike those non similar ourselves in color, age, social standing, or religion, at some time or other?
I other of import flaw--some might not call it a flaw at all--is Crusoe's bond of utility rather than bond of mutual respect that forms the footing of his friendships. Crusoe is a man that, early in the novel, is a friend when the other person can requite something. This can exist seen afterwards Crusoe'south "entering into a strict friendship with this captain." The helm, "to my great misfortune" writes Crusoe, dies soon after his arrival. At outset readers are a little taken aback by this and other instances of Crusoe'due south utilitarian mental attitude. But closer exam of our own personal behavior is necessary earlier we give up on him.
What of our own utilitarian behavior? For case, hither in college we sit beside other students for months at a time making pocket-size talk and borrowing each other's notes. Only when 18th Century English language is finished, the same students that depended on one another for notes and encouragement do not even say hello in the corridor! We rather turn abroad our eyes rather than have to bother with all that is involved in making a new friend. A real new friend. Were not, and then, all those pleasantries merely for utility?
This theme of people beingness used but for personal gain is interesting when nosotros consider that Defoe had his hero denied whatsoever homo contact for about of his stay on the island. And in such a manner does Crusoe rage, as we all would, at his predicament. The hero is at his lowest ebb when he realizes at that place are no survivors of a later shipwreck, and he let loose all of his emotions as he laments, "Oh that in that location had been but one! .... Oh had in that location been only one". Now think, this is the same man who, earlier in the novel, sold picayune Xury, a boy willing to give his life for Crusoe, into slavery for a few bits of silvery.
So Crusoe was bad. So we are all users! Nosotros all autumn curt. Perchance this is why Crusoe constantly speaks of his unworthiness. This is a man who examines himself and definitely feels he has fallen curt. He constantly speaks of his "original sin." This is supposed to be the sin of disobeying his begetter and going to bounding main instead of following the relatively safe path of middle class ordinariness. Crusoe's sin of disobedience to his begetter is something that hangs over him for his entire stay on the island and is deeply wound upward in the fiber of his spiritual questioning. But is Crusoe's sin equally terrible as all that?
Peradventure we can see this disobedience towards the male parent every bit a veil for a bigger issue. Is the sin Defoe really speaking of the sin of beingness born human? What is described equally "this propension of nature" may be what is, in actuality, a clarification of our fragile human being nature. A homo nature so delicate that it becomes very hard to do what is right. This fragile nature keeps us down in the quagmire of humanness--with our brother Crusoe. I do not think, so, that nosotros are at liberty to betoken fingers at him. Instead, we should ask ourselves why is it so difficult to rise above our smallness, our shallowness, and become great?
Yep. Why is it so hard to ascend to that higher level of existence? We often try to convert ourselves, similar Crusoe did, to become better individuals, merely as Defoe details so well in his book, we know how hard it is to truly catechumen. Sometimes we only pray a petty, like Crusoe, when the tempest threatens or the globe rumbles. Perhaps information technology is not possible to convert at all. I thing that must be realized is that nosotros certainly have many opportunities in a lifetime to exercise so. I had an opportunity a few weeks agone and I let it pass me past.
We moved into our new parish six months ago. Normally, past this time both my hubby and I have met all the sick and shut-ins. There was ane lady though, Anna, whom I never went to encounter. One of Anna's sons killed himself, ane of her daughters is a purse lady, her last daughter has Downs syndrome, and her other three children never visit her. This lady and her husband of most 60 years had their share of personal hardship. To add to this, Anna had advanced cancer, then never got out much. A few weeks ago Anna died.
Since the funeral, yes, everyone goes to the funeral, I have met her husband. Now that Anna is gone, he goes for long walks and dropped in ane night. Through speaking with him, listening to his mourning, I have gotten to know his wife. Simply the guilt of never bothering to visit and go to know her, the person, is still with me. The selfish reason for not visiting her was I did not want to share in her unhappiness. I did not want the emotional burden of going to her home and sharing in her life. I did not have time to experience deplorable. I take plenty of my ain sadness, I thought.
So I missed that one chance to raise myself up--on to higher ground. This is, I am distressing to say, all likewise common, not only in my life, but in general. Nosotros are so busy condign successful that information technology is easy to forget what is really important--people and relationships. There is only time to concentrate on the physical and neglect what is spiritual. And this is what Crusoe is all about. He shows the states the race for things is not as of import as a human phonation or human companionship. What we have to strive at is to overcome the need to be in that race for things, that "obstinacy" of human frailty, that wants to eat, to swamp united states of america, as the storm or wild animals want to consume Crusoe.
Those wild animals never did get Crusoe. He was, in fact very lucky. In Defoe'south prodigal son parable, Crusoe might not have had his biological parents to come up back and make amends to, but the onetime captain and the widow, with their unconditional goodness, brand appropriate substitutions. And while Crusoe is on the island a small fortune accumulates, and then he is well able to put things in social club on his return. I know now that "providence" will not always be as kind to me. I may not get the adventure, as Crusoe did, to make things correct when I choose to. As the writer Stephen Grellet says, I have to practice it now.
So you lot meet, there is a lot to be learnt from Robinson Crusoe! It teaches us the basics so we exercise not have to spend twenty-eight years on a desert island. Nosotros learn that what really keeps us downward is our human self absorption and that we have to rise above this terrible selfishness. We learn that finding the self is acknowledging our frailty and working, in spite of it, towards making our spiritual side strong. If I realize what is important in life, I know I have learnt from Crusoe'due south experiences and will never have to weep "Oh had there been merely one ....
Ex. ii Write a reaction essay virtually a film you take recently seen. Summarize the moving picture'south plot in the introduction. How did you experience about the pic? Could y'all place with the state of affairs? How do you evaluate the pic?
Seminar 8
Theoretical materials for revision:
AnArgumentative Essay
Paraphrasing
Summarizing
Synthesizing
Дата добавления: 2015-11-14; просмотров: 72 | Нарушение авторских прав
Source: https://mybiblioteka.su/tom2/10-67109.html
0 Response to "How to Read and Write Reaction Essay"
Post a Comment